Peter McClard
1 min readMar 2, 2022

--

I very much enjoy and respect your commentary which is quite insightful. I don't agree that my description is entirely Newtonian since I posited a "changing clock" theory that is very relativistic though in layman's terms.

I certainly take no offense in you ribbing me for bringing up a random list of paranormal intangibles however I only mean to say that the "strangeness" of the Universe is still undetermined. For example in the Universe as Simulation model, anything that was in our dreams or minds would be no more or less real than ourselves and would therefor be just as "normal." Or if on the other hand, enough time has elapsed then the potential of a thing to become real somewhere seems intuitively more statistically likely, sort of like evolution works.

Temporal Majesty is my poetic name for Eternity. We often speak of majestic mountains or galaxies so why not have the same awe and reverence for Time?

Thank you for your thoughtful responses!

--

--

Peter McClard
Peter McClard

Written by Peter McClard

As a creative type, entrepreneur and philosopher, I write on many topics and try to offer solutions to, or useful insights into common problems.

No responses yet